Re: [PATCH 1/3] evaluate: warn on identical exprs around '&&'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Also, how does your patch handle expressions like this: *x++ && *x++
> Or this: f() && f()

Those cases will both warn. Do I need to be looking for potential side
effects, and considering these expressions "probably correct" in those
cases?

-- Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux