(slightly) inconsistent code in evaluate.c:type_difference

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello, Sparse devs,

in evaluate.c, at lines 623 and 624, t1 and t2 are expected not to be
NULL, while a few lines later (630 and 638), they are checked to avoid
a NULL pointer dereference. That's at least a bit confusing.

Thanks,
	Jonathan Neuschäfer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux