Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:31:55PM -0400, Chris Ball wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 23 2011, Venkatraman S wrote:
>> > - struct mmc_request mrq = {0};
>> > + struct mmc_request mrq = {NULL};
>>
>> The sparse warning is mistaken. Or I'm mistaken. But I suspect it's
>> the sparse warning.
>
> Notice that it says "the remainder of the aggregate". The first field
> still gets initialized with the 0 you supplied, and the first field of
> struct mmc_request has a pointer type.
That's an understandable position, but I think it would also be
reasonable for sparse to special case using {0} as an
initializer. {0} is a valid initializer for every type and so
it's sometimes used as an initializer for a local variable to get
the same effect that one would have for a static variable without
specifying an initializer.
--
Ben Pfaff
http://benpfaff.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
