On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 05:09:42PM -0700, Christopher Li wrote: > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Ben Pfaff <blp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I could change my IDL code generator to do something different for > > this case, but I don't see anything actually wrong with it. ?This > > userspace code is not performance-critical or sensitive to memory > > usage, so it's not necessary on the face of it to optimize it. > > Removing the warning will lose the chance to see it on other potential > problematic usage. If you insist on no warning. You can submit a patch > to add a switch to disable it. We have a lot of those for fine grain warning > control. I just don't see this warning can hurt on the kernel checking side. For now, I've decided to just rewrite code on the Open vSwitch side to avoid sizeof(_Bool) entirely. If it becomes a problem again, I'll submit a -Wno-sizeof-bool patch. Thanks for considering my reasons. Ben -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
