On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I wonder, does it make sense to support these kinds of >> architecture-specific builtins on all architectures, rather than >> limiting them based on some specified target architecture? >> >> Since Sparse doesn't generate code, it can easily target all >> architectures simultaneously, but that doesn't mean we couldn't tell it >> what architecture to target. Sparse could default to targeting the >> host architecture, which would avoid the need to pass extra flags in the >> common case. > > it does sound like it'd be useful to add an arch command line option. but i > hoped we could sneak in the Blackfin stuff first since other arches (like > alpha) have been whitelisted. Can we have some "ifdef" for the blackfin architecture in the pre buffer? I agree with Josh, that do look like very much blackfin specific. We can leave the ignore attribute alone for now. Chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
