On Fre, 2010-08-20 at 16:03 -0700, Christopher Li wrote: > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 3:33 AM, Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Well, the equivalent for "MOD_WEAK" is "[structof]" - which seems wrong > > to me. > > And the parts for "inline" also doesn't fit AFAICS. > > > > What did I actually miss? > > Nothing. We remove some bits from the modifier but forget to update > the modifier_string function. > > Care for a patch? Not a big problem. Hmm, is it prudent to use c99, e.g. for named initializers und array? Bernd -- mobile: +43 664 4416156 http://www.sysprog.at/ Linux Software Development, Consulting and Services -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
