On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 21:23 +0200, Kamil Dudka wrote: > Sure, I don't object it anyhow. As a C++ programmer I've certainly different > attitude to type safety, thus biased. I believe kernel developers would more > likely agree with your point of view. If you run patched sparse on the kernel and fix the first ten warnings in a nice, unobtrusive way, and there is no warning that you cannot fix, chances are that the kernel developers will like your changes, even if it makes the code look more like C++ or even Java :-) If the fixes involve casts or conversion of enum types to integers or a serious code reorganization, then perhaps the kernel developers won't like your changes. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
