Re: [PATCH] do not ignore attribute 'noreturn'...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday 14 of September 2009 19:27:40 Christopher Li wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Yes, no return is kind of useful. I think we need to do some thing about
> > the MOD_XXX eventually. It is very easy to run out of bits there.
>
> Ah, the MOD_NORETURN is bigger than size of long in 32 bit systems.
> I just get a few warning from GCC.
>
> I just relocate the MOD_NORETURN bits.

Thanks! It makes sense to me.

As for the long term solution, I don't think it's possible without breaking 
the current API/ABI. What about using a bitfield instead? I can see it solved 
this way in <gcc/tree.h>.

Kamil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux