Re: [bug, bisected, -chrisl] Segfault at evaluate.c:341

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>
> It needed testing, all right - #elif handling got broken by the initial
> variant...  Hopefully fixed version follows:

Looks good. BTW, it is simpler than my version which try to do
the processor in argument list.

Applied, thanks.

Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux