Re: Nasal demons in preprocessor use (Re: [PATCH] test-suite: new preprocessor test case)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 07:08:53PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > I guess this means that kmemcheck branch should be withdrawn from 
> > linux-next, at least temporarily, as I have no immediate 
> > workarounds/alternatives. Stephen, can you drop it?
> 
> Al Viro, well done :-(
> 
> 	Ingo

What the fuck?

Al
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux