Re: [patches] more declarations fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 12:10 AM, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> OK, that pile ought to take care of a lot of nastiness.  We still have
> rather messy crap in attributes' handling, but it's actually getting
> cleaner now.  In particular, direct_declarator and declaration_specifiers
> are relatively sane, handling of type specifiers should be correct now (and
> much cleaner than it used to be) and most of the tangled mess around
> attributes is untangled.  Still a mess, but at least doing something
> about it becomes feasible...
>

I really like these series of patches. All applied.

It is much cleaner now.

BTW, what does Set_S and Set_T means? Symbol and type?

Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux