christ.li@xxxxxxxxx schrieb am 09.02.2009 08:37:50:
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 4:51 AM, Thomas Schmid
> <Thomas.Schmid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > christ.li@xxxxxxxxx schrieb am 06.02.2009 05:15:37:
> > - if (newtype->ctype.base_type != &fp_type) {
> > + if (is_int_type(newtype)) {
>
> I change your patch a little bit. The old logic of testing against float
> type is better. The type can be a pointer for example. Then using
> the long long value is more correct.
>
> See the patch attached.
>
> If there is not objections. I am going to apply this one.
Thank you for correcting, your changes work fine for me.
There's only a little problem with the patch,
patch breaks off in evaluate.c, cause there's no function "is_void_type"
within...
Greetings
Thomas Schmid
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
