On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 12:19 +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: [....] > > Let alone that it is somewhat simpler to have *one* CFLAGS/CPPFLAGS/... > > variable and use that everywhere. > Well, that aside, the overall build time significantly increases with > having to run sparse twice. Same warnings/errors are reported twice. Of course (and especially on a large source tree). > I still think that sparse has no business validating any code when > cgcc is called in -M mode; all those files are going to be compiled Yes, that also seems superflous to me in general. > later on anyway. And it's the compilation stage where warnings are > desirable. ACK. Bernd -- Firmix Software GmbH http://www.firmix.at/ mobil: +43 664 4416156 fax: +43 1 7890849-55 Embedded Linux Development and Services -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
