Re: context imbalance false positive sparse warnings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 17:22 -0500, Steve French wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Stalin Kenny <stalinlinux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Even the simplest use cases throw this error e.g. fs/super.c line 162-164:
> >>
> >> static void put_super(struct super_block *sb)
> >> {
> >>       spin_lock(&sb_lock);
> >>       __put_super(sb);
> >>       spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
> >> }
> >
> > What is the sparse error when you call this function ?
> CHECK   fs/super.c
> fs/super.c:164:2: warning: context imbalance in 'put_super': wrong count at exit
> fs/super.c:164:2:    context 'lock': wanted 0, got 1
> 
> 

Johannes Berg had a 9-patch series that improved this somewhat, but they had
some bugs in them (crashes).  But I've been running with them anyway as they
do improve cases like this significantly.

Harvey

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux