On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Josh Triplett <josht@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I can't think of any fundamental reason not to do this, other than the > standard reason of data structure size. There is other ways to avoid the size blow up. At the linearized byte code level, the back end only need to know it is one of the stander C type . So we have an array of stander ctype C type similar to ctype_declaration[]. We just need to replace the size member with the array index in the instruction struct.. Chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
