Now that I've gotten the sparse noise in drivers/infiniband down to a fairly low level, I'm starting to look at some of the more recalcitrant false positive warnings. One example is: drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/qp.c:605:2: warning: context imbalance in 'mlx4_ib_lock_cqs' - wrong count at exit where the function being warned about is: static void mlx4_ib_lock_cqs(struct mlx4_ib_cq *send_cq, struct mlx4_ib_cq *recv_cq) { if (send_cq == recv_cq) spin_lock_irq(&send_cq->lock); else if (send_cq->mcq.cqn < recv_cq->mcq.cqn) { spin_lock_irq(&send_cq->lock); spin_lock_nested(&recv_cq->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); } else { spin_lock_irq(&recv_cq->lock); spin_lock_nested(&send_cq->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); } } this function wraps up the locking rules for aquiring the completion queue (CQ) locks associated with a queue pair (QP) -- the rule is that if both the send and receive CQs are the same object, we (obviously) only lock it once, otherwise we take the lock belonging to the CQ with a numerically lower ID first (to avoid AB-BA deadlocks). So obviously is it correct and intended that this function return holding one or two locks, but I don't know how to tell sparse that. I've tried messing around with __acquires() etc but it doesn't seem to be exactly what I want. Is there any way to tell sparse what's going on here, or do I just live with the warnings? Thanks, Roland -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html