Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle: proscribe do-while without braces.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 18:00 +0200, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > it's better that we all do things the same way.  What that way _is_ is
> > actually less important, unless it's something stupid, of course.
> 
> It's certainly true WRT things like indentation but IMHO it shouldn't
> go that far, and if it goes, it should be non-braced version.
> 
> If we prefer non-braced versions of "if" and "while", it would be
> a bit strange to require braces with "do while", wouldn't it?

Perhaps, but
     1. Existing kernel style uses braces with single-statement
        do-while.
     2. Linus prefers (or at least preferred in October of 2006) braces
        with single-statement do-while.

> Sparse warnings... I think it shouldn't complain either, unless
> called with extra parameter.

Good point; Sparse shouldn't warn about this by default.  I've turned
that off in latest Sparse from Git, so you need to give -Wdo-while or
-Wall to get warnings about that.  However, the kernel gives -Wall, so
you'll still see the warnings there.

- Josh Triplett


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux