Hopefully correct handling of integer constant expressions. Please,
review.
Heh... The first catches are lovely:
struct fxsrAlignAssert {
int _:!(offsetof(struct task_struct,
thread.i387.fxsave) & 15);
};
That's... wow?
#define _IOC_TYPECHECK(t) \
((sizeof(t) == sizeof(t[1]) && \
sizeof(t) < (1 << _IOC_SIZEBITS)) ? \
sizeof(t) : __invalid_size_argument_for_IOC)
poisoning _IOW() et.al., so those who do something like
static const char *v4l1_ioctls[] = {
[_IOC_NR(VIDIOCGCAP)] = "VIDIOCGCAP",
run into trouble.
The only reason that doesn't break gcc to hell and back is
that gcc has unfixed bugs in that area.
If I understand correctly what bugs you are talking about,
most (all?) of those were solved in the dark ages already
(i.e., the 3.x series).
It certainly is not a valid C
Why not? Nothing in the C standard says all your externs
have to be defined in some other translation unit you link
with AFAIK.
or even a remotely sane one.
It's unusual at least :-)
Segher
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
