Damien Lespiau wrote:
>> Al Viro wrote:
>>> Not just glibc; it's in C99. So yes, I'd say we should use %td here.
>
> Much better than my ugly cast. I feel stupid to "sign" a one letter patch
> that is not mine, but I guess you expect me to resend it.
Don't worry about it. I went ahead and made the change:
From 3195f83203cfd6d05cd56829c02c16b5dc5c274d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 14:18:28 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Use %td when printing a ptrdiff_t to avoid problems on 64-bit platforms
Thanks to Damien Lespiau for reporting the problem.
Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
linearize.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/linearize.c b/linearize.c
index d428d92..c38dd7d 100644
--- a/linearize.c
+++ b/linearize.c
@@ -461,7 +461,7 @@ const char *show_instruction(struct instruction *insn)
}
if (buf >= buffer + sizeof(buffer))
- die("instruction buffer overflowed %d\n", buf - buffer);
+ die("instruction buffer overflowed %td\n", buf - buffer);
do { --buf; } while (*buf == ' ');
*++buf = 0;
return buffer;
- Josh Triplett
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
