Re: barrier macro

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Josh Triplett wrote:
> After analyzing net/sunrpc/xprtsock.i, I managed to reproduce the problem with
> the following test case:
> 
> #define barrier() __asm__ __volatile__("": : :"memory")
> 
> static void f(void)
> {
> 	barrier();
> l:
> 	barrier();
> }
> 
> 
> Apparently sparse doesn't like __asm__ __volatile__ after a label.  Looks like
> the change to enable attributes on labels makes Sparse interpret the __asm__
> as an attribute on the label, not as a statement.  If I locally revert the
> label attributes change, aec53c938c34c47cdbdd6824552e0f2a5104b1cb, this test
> case compiles without warning, as does net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c.
> 
> The label attributes change needs some additional work, to make it only handle
> attribute and __attribute__, and nothing else.

Fixed in current Git.

- Josh Triplett


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux