Re: sparse preprocessing confused

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 11:38:52PM +0900, Neil Booth wrote:

> > >        memcpy(data + nhead, skb->head,
> > >#ifdef NET_SKBUFF_DATA_USES_OFFSET
> > >                skb->tail);
> > >#else
> > >                skb->tail - skb->head);
> > >#endif
> >
> > If memcpy happens to be a macro, that is not valid C.
>
> It's undefined rather than invalid.  GCC makes an effort to
> do "what you'd expect".

I think I prefer sparse breaking on things like this (so we can find
such uglies and correct them.).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux