Re: [PATCH 7] Adding the interrupt checker

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 6:07:06, Pavel Roskin wrote:
Moreover, I think that incorrect use of locking is a remaining major
issue not covered by sparse.

Hello,

What particular locking usage rules would Sparse ideally check? I
guess this would include finding double locking/unlocking errors. Are
there other more important locking usage rules? Could locking errors
in the kernel be potentially more serious than dereferencing an
unchecked user pointer for example?

Suhabe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux