Re: sparse segfault in kernel -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 14:28:24 -0800 Christopher Li wrote:

> Here is my version base on your email.
> 
> I need to change the gcc include path though. But it does not crash on me.
> 
> I did not get crash on allmodconfig either.
> 
> Chris

Hi,
OK, uh, what did we expect from this?
I changed /redhat/ to /suse/ and lib to lib64.  Here's what I got:
(split into multiple lines for my email client)


/home/rddunlap/scripts/cli_bad.sh: line 1: 17720 Segmentation fault      sparse -D__linux__ -Dlinux -D__STDC__ -Dunix -D__unix__ -Wbitwise -D__x86_64__ -m64 -nostdinc -isystem /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.1.0/include -Wp,-MD,drivers/net/vioc/.vioc_provision.o.d -nostdinc 
-isystem /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.1.0/include -D__KERNEL__ -Iinclude -include include/linux/autoconf.h -Wall -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -Os -mtune=generic -m64 -mno-red-zone -mcmodel=kernel -pipe -fno-reorder-blocks -Wno-sign-compare -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -funit-at-a-time -mno-sse -mno-mmx -mno-sse2 
-mno-3dnow -maccumulate-outgoing-args -DCONFIG_AS_CFI=1 -DCONFIG_AS_CFI_SIGNAL_FRAME=1 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-calls -g -fno-stack-protector -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wno-pointer-sign -DMODULE -D"KBUILD_STR(s)=#s" -D"KBUILD_BASENAME=KBUILD_STR(vioc_provision)" -D"KBUILD_MODNAME=KBUILD_STR(vioc)" drivers/net/vioc/vioc_provision.c


It looks like the problem (as I experience it) is in
drivers/net/vioc/vioc_provision.c, in this struct:
(it just takes a boatload of header files to get to this)

	static struct vnic_prov_def vnic_set_0 = {
	.rxd_ring[0].buf_size = RXDQ_SMALL_ALLOC_BUFSIZE,
	.rxd_ring[0].entries = RXDQ_SMALL_ENTRIES,
	.rxd_ring[0].id = 0,
	.rxd_ring[0].state = 1,
	.rxd_ring[1].buf_size = RXDQ_STD_ALLOC_BUFSIZE,
	.rxd_ring[1].entries = RXDQ_STD_ENTRIES,
	.rxd_ring[1].id = 1,
	.rxd_ring[1].state = 1,
	.rxd_ring[2].buf_size = RXDQ_JUMBO_ALLOC_BUFSIZE,
	.rxd_ring[2].entries = RXDQ_JUMBO_ENTRIES,
	.rxd_ring[2].id = 2,
	.rxd_ring[2].state = 1,
	.tx_entries = TXQ_ENTRIES,.rxc_entries = RXC_ENTRIES,.rxc_id =
	    0,.rxc_intr_id = 0
};


but I'll keep reducing the size of the .i file to try to be
sure about this.



> On 3/6/07, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:19:37 -0500 Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > OK, that produced a large .i file and running:
> >   sparse vioc_provision.i
> > does reproduce the segfault, so now I am cutting down the size of
> > the .i file, then I'll send it in.


---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux