On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:54:47AM -0800, Christopher Li wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:24:09AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Actually, it's often better to just explicitly make "ctype" be > > "&bad_ctype" instead. > > > > It's nice if a NULL type means "type has not been evaluated yet", and then > > using "&bad_ctype" to mean "type evaluated to crap". > > Good idea. Some of the code already doing that. I am making it as a separate > patch because touch a lot of code. This is very messy. The current evaluate_* functions are assuming NULL means for "some error happen in this expression, I can't get the ctype". It is all over the place. Chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
