[PATCH 4/4] Typo fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Pavel Roskin <proski@xxxxxxx>

Signed-off-by: Pavel Roskin <proski@xxxxxxx>
---

 evaluate.c                                   |    2 +-
 example.c                                    |    4 ++--
 expand.c                                     |    2 +-
 inline.c                                     |    2 +-
 memops.c                                     |    2 +-
 pre-process.c                                |    2 +-
 simplify.c                                   |    2 +-
 symbol.c                                     |    2 +-
 validation/initializer-entry-defined-twice.c |    2 +-
 9 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/evaluate.c b/evaluate.c
index 6fb6be2..ca49ed0 100644
--- a/evaluate.c
+++ b/evaluate.c
@@ -1475,7 +1475,7 @@ static struct symbol *evaluate_dereferen
 
 	switch (ctype->type) {
 	default:
-		sparse_error(expr->pos, "cannot derefence this type");
+		sparse_error(expr->pos, "cannot dereference this type");
 		return NULL;
 	case SYM_PTR:
 		node->ctype.modifiers = target->ctype.modifiers & MOD_SPECIFIER;
diff --git a/example.c b/example.c
index 7e30c22..7c2bae3 100644
--- a/example.c
+++ b/example.c
@@ -942,7 +942,7 @@ static void generate_commutative_binop(s
 	if (!is_dead_reg(state, src1, reg1))
 		goto do_switch;
 
-	/* Both are dead. Is one preferrable? */
+	/* Both are dead. Is one preferable? */
 	if (reg2 != preferred_reg(state, insn->target))
 		goto dont_switch;
 
@@ -1493,7 +1493,7 @@ static void write_reg_to_storage(struct
 
 		/* Fall back on stack allocation ... */
 		alloc_stack(state, storage);
-		/* Fallthroigh */
+		/* Fallthrough */
 	default:
 		output_insn(state, "movl %s,%s", reg->name, show_memop(storage));
 		return;
diff --git a/expand.c b/expand.c
index a34d07d..90f7f36 100644
--- a/expand.c
+++ b/expand.c
@@ -562,7 +562,7 @@ static int expand_dereference(struct exp
 	/*
 	 * NOTE! We get a bogus warning right now for some special
 	 * cases: apparently I've screwed up the optimization of
-	 * a zero-offset derefence, and the ctype is wrong.
+	 * a zero-offset dereference, and the ctype is wrong.
 	 *
 	 * Leave the warning in anyway, since this is also a good
 	 * test for me to get the type evaluation right..
diff --git a/inline.c b/inline.c
index 81530d1..77adfab 100644
--- a/inline.c
+++ b/inline.c
@@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ static struct statement *copy_one_statem
 }
 
 /*
- * Copy a stateemnt tree from 'src' to 'dst', where both
+ * Copy a statement tree from 'src' to 'dst', where both
  * source and destination are of type STMT_COMPOUND.
  *
  * We do this for the tree-level inliner.
diff --git a/memops.c b/memops.c
index 8fd777d..bdecf14 100644
--- a/memops.c
+++ b/memops.c
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ found_dominator:
  * we can no longer really use "container()" to get from a user to
  * the instruction that uses it.
  *
- * This happens to work, simply because the likelyhood of the
+ * This happens to work, simply because the likelihood of the
  * (possibly non-instruction) containing the right bitpattern
  * in the right place is pretty low. But this is still wrong.
  *
diff --git a/pre-process.c b/pre-process.c
index 08d1a2e..81a535e 100644
--- a/pre-process.c
+++ b/pre-process.c
@@ -630,7 +630,7 @@ static int already_tokenized(const char
 	return 0;
 }
 
-/* Hande include of header files.
+/* Handle include of header files.
  * The relevant options are made compatible with gcc. The only options that
  * are not supported is -withprefix and friends.
  *
diff --git a/simplify.c b/simplify.c
index 495f5d3..a8b736b 100644
--- a/simplify.c
+++ b/simplify.c
@@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ offset:
 
 /*
  * We walk the whole chain of adds/subs backwards. That's not
- * only more efficient, but it allows us to find looops.
+ * only more efficient, but it allows us to find loops.
  */
 static int simplify_memop(struct instruction *insn)
 {
diff --git a/symbol.c b/symbol.c
index 6c91112..a9b26b5 100644
--- a/symbol.c
+++ b/symbol.c
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ static struct symbol *examine_pointer_ty
 	 * We need to set the pointer size first, and
 	 * examine the thing we point to only afterwards.
 	 * That's because this pointer type may end up
-	 * being needed for the base type size evalutation.
+	 * being needed for the base type size evaluation.
 	 */
 	if (!sym->bit_size)
 		sym->bit_size = bits_in_pointer;
diff --git a/validation/initializer-entry-defined-twice.c b/validation/initializer-entry-defined-twice.c
index 80434f1..58f314b 100644
--- a/validation/initializer-entry-defined-twice.c
+++ b/validation/initializer-entry-defined-twice.c
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ struct has_union union_error = {
 };
 
 /* Empty structures can make two fields have the same offset in a struct.
- * Initialzing both should not trigger the warning. */
+ * Initializing both should not trigger the warning. */
 struct empty { };
 
 struct same_offset {
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux