Re: [PATCHSET] fouled-bitwise handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Sun, 1 Oct 2006, Al Viro wrote:
> 
> Hrm...  The gut feeling: we mangle expression trees too much to be able
> to do that decently.

Having looked at it a bit now, I think I agree.

We warn about the whole "~" thing too early, so we'd have to remove that 
warning anyway (easy enough to do), but then we'd have to track the ops 
that don't like using a "~" because of its C semantics.

And at that point, your "fouled" bit is actually probably simpler.

Let me think about this a bit more, but I'm starting to think that you're 
right.

As usual.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux