Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: dt-bindings: imx-audio-spdif: convert to YAML

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 11:06 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 08/04/2024 10:01, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> >>> +
> >>> +anyOf:
> >>> +  - required:
> >>> +      - spdif-in
> >>> +  - required:
> >>> +      - spdif-out
> >>> +  - required:
> >>> +      - spdif-out
> >>> +      - spdif-in
> >>
> >> Do you need the last required block?
> >
> > Yes,  one of them or both are required.
>
> And? It's already there: that's the meaning of any. It is not oneOf...
> Before answering please test your changes and ideas. I pointed issue
> here and you responded just to close my comment. That does not make me
> happy, just wastes my time.

Maybe I didn't express clearly.

we need at least one of them (spdif-in, spdif-out) in the node.  which means
that we need to select  "spdif-in",  or "spdif-out",  or "spdif-in and
spdif-out".

So my understanding is that need to use "anyOf", if it is wrong, please let
me know.

>
> >
> >>
> >>> +
> >>> +additionalProperties: false
> >>> +
> >>> +examples:
> >>> +  - |
> >>> +    sound {
> >>
> >> That's a random change...

So  I can use "sound-spdif", right?

best regards
wang shengjiu

> >>
> >> Instead of sending two patches per day, please carefully address the
> >> feedback.
> >
> > In v1 you suggest to change it to spdif?  but spdif may conflict
> > with the fsl,spdif.yaml.   so which name I should use?
>
> I don't understand where is the conflict. That's a different binding.
>
>





[Index of Archives]     [Pulseaudio]     [Linux Audio Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux