Hello Rob,
Thanks for the review.
On 5/4/2021 12:48 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 04:03:05PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
Add device tree bindings for display clock controller subsystem for
Qualcomm Technology Inc's SC7280 SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <tdas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../bindings/clock/qcom,sc7280-dispcc.yaml | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++
include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sc7280.h | 55 +++++++++++++
2 files changed, 149 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sc7280-dispcc.yaml
create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sc7280.h
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sc7280-dispcc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sc7280-dispcc.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2178666
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sc7280-dispcc.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
+...
diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sc7280.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sc7280.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2074b30
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sc7280.h
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
Dual license please. I'm tired of telling the company that complained to
me about having dual licensing for DT stuff not dual license their
stuff. Please pass that on to your coworkers.
Rob
Rob, I have taken a note on this and will be taken care from the next time.
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.
--
