Hi Stephen,
Thanks for the review.
On 7/21/2020 1:21 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
+...
diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sc7180.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sc7180.h
index 992b67b..bdf43adc 100644
--- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sc7180.h
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sc7180.h
@@ -138,6 +138,7 @@
#define GCC_MSS_Q6_MEMNOC_AXI_CLK 128
#define GCC_MSS_SNOC_AXI_CLK 129
#define GCC_SEC_CTRL_CLK_SRC 130
+#define GCC_LPASS_CFG_NOC_SWAY_CLK 131
/* GCC resets */
#define GCC_QUSB2PHY_PRIM_BCR 0
This hunk should be in the next patch. Oh but then that patch should come
before this one so the binding can use it. Either way, shouldn't be part
of this patch.
We had a problem with the bot complaining about the clock handles being
used in the example.
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/1582540703-6328-4-git-send-email-tdas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
Thus I have kept the GCC bindings in the same patch.
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.
--
