On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 1:06 PM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Quoting Matthias Kaehlcke (2019-10-31 10:41:49)
> > Hi Taniya,
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 04:59:26PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
> > > Hi Matthias,
> > >
> > > Thanks for your comments.
> > >
> > > On 10/29/2019 11:29 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > > > Hi Taniya,
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 03:53:08PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
> > > > > Add support for the global clock controller found on SC7180
> > > > > based devices. This should allow most non-multimedia device
> > > > > drivers to probe and control their clocks.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <tdas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > >
> > > > v3 also had
> > > >
> > > > + [GCC_DISP_AHB_CLK] = &gcc_disp_ahb_clk.clkr,
> > > >
> > > > Removing it makes the dpu_mdss driver unhappy:
> > > >
> > > > [ 2.999855] dpu_mdss_enable+0x2c/0x58->msm_dss_enable_clk: 'iface' is not available
> > > >
> > > > because:
> > > >
> > > > mdss: mdss@ae00000 {
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > => clocks = <&gcc GCC_DISP_AHB_CLK>,
> > > > <&gcc GCC_DISP_HF_AXI_CLK>,
> > > > <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_MDP_CLK>;
> > > > clock-names = "iface", "gcc_bus", "core";
> > > > };
> > > >
> > >
> > > The basic idea as you mentioned below was to move the CRITICAL clocks to
> > > probe. The clock provider to return NULL in case the clocks are not
> > > registered.
> > > This was discussed with Stephen on v3. Thus I submitted the below patch.
> > > clk: qcom: common: Return NULL from clk_hw OF provider.
> >
> > I see. My assumption was that the entire clock hierarchy should be registered,
> > but Stephen almost certainly knows better :)
> >
> > > Yes it would throw these warnings, but no functional issue is observed from
> > > display. I have tested it on the cheza board.
> >
> > The driver considers it an error (uses DEV_ERR to log the message) and doesn't
> > handle other clocks when one is found missing. I'm not really famililar with
> > the dpu_mdss driver, but I imagine this can have some side effects. Added some
> > of the authors/contributors to cc.
>
> NULL is a valid clk pointer returned by clk_get(). What is the display
> driver doing that makes it consider NULL an error?
>
do we not have an iface clk? I think the driver assumes we should
have one, rather than it being an optional thing.. we could ofc change
that
BR,
-R
