Switching Andy's email address.
On Mon, Jul 01 2019 at 09:32 -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
When triggering a TCS to send its contents, reading back the trigger
value may return an incorrect value. That is because, writing the
trigger may raise an interrupt which could be handled immediately and
the trigger value could be reset in the interrupt handler. By doing a
read back we may end up spinning waiting for the value we wrote.
Fixes: 658628 ("drivers: qcom: rpmh-rsc: add RPMH controller for QCOM
SoCs")
Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <ilina@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
index 92461311aef3..2fc2fa879480 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ static void __tcs_trigger(struct rsc_drv *drv, int tcs_id)
enable = TCS_AMC_MODE_ENABLE;
write_tcs_reg_sync(drv, RSC_DRV_CONTROL, tcs_id, enable);
enable |= TCS_AMC_MODE_TRIGGER;
- write_tcs_reg_sync(drv, RSC_DRV_CONTROL, tcs_id, enable);
+ write_tcs_reg(drv, RSC_DRV_CONTROL, tcs_id, enable);
}
static int check_for_req_inflight(struct rsc_drv *drv, struct tcs_group *tcs,
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
