Re: [PATCH 2/9] ARM: qcom: remove unnecessary boot_lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 01:50:56PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 7:00 PM Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > The boot_lock is something that was required for ARM development
> > platforms to ensure that the delay calibration worked properly.  This
> > is not necessary for modern platforms that have better bus bandwidth
> > and do not need to calibrate the delay loop for secondary cores.
> > Remove the boot_lock entirely.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Andy have you had a chance to test/apply this patch?

I would rather folk do not _apply_ these patches - the final patch
is dependent on all the preceeding patches, and if they're applied
to individual trees, it will mean that the final patch has to be
delayed by a complete kernel development cycle to avoid bisect

RMK's Patch system:
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux