On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 11:18 PM Bjorn Andersson
<bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri 26 Oct 10:35 PDT 2018, Evan Green wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> > index b72bdb0a31a5..9c72edb678ec 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> > @@ -808,6 +808,73 @@
> > };
> > };
> >
> > + ufshc1: ufshc@1d84000 {
>
> There's only one ufshc and one ufsphy, so no need to include the index.
Aren't there two UFS controllers on SDM845, a "card" one and a "mem"
one? I'm only adding the "mem" one here since that's all I can test,
but I thought it made sense to leave the number there so someone could
add the "card" one later if needed.
>
> [..]
> > + resets = <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_BCR>;
> > + reset-names = "rst";
>
> I have this as well, but this is not used by the upstream driver nor is
> it mentioned in the dt-binding.
I see it in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt,
but then the only place I see it being used is ufs-hisi.c. So you're
right, I think I should spin and remove this. Since I'm spinning, let
me know about the numbering thing above.
>
> > +
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > +
> > + ufsphy1: phy@1d87000 {
>
> With reservation for the "reset" issue:
>
> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Regards,
> Bjorn
