Hi Bjorn, Sorry for getting back to this late. On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 12:34:45PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Tue 25 Sep 10:29 PDT 2018, Brian Norris wrote: > For the record; I did consider making the rmtfs implementation the one > driving the remoteproc state through /sys/class/remoteproc, but that > would not cope with abnormal termination of the rmtfs implementation. It could, if you had rmtfs always power cycle the modem on startup. But we'd be in a bad situation in the meantime, so that might not be great. > I will work up a patch making the remoteproc driver observe the presence > of the RMTFS_QMI_SERVICE and see how that looks. I believe Sibi Sankar already sent a v2 with the rmtfs driver doing this instead. He also replied to this email with slightly different suggestions; I'll try to reply to both of those. Thanks, Brian
