On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 11:53 PM, Amit Nischal <anischal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2018-05-07 22:41, Rob Herring wrote: >> >> On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 04:16:53PM +0530, Amit Nischal wrote: >>> >>> On 2018-05-04 22:01, Stephen Boyd wrote: >>> > Quoting Amit Nischal (2018-05-03 05:35:23) >>> > > Changes in v1: >>> > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/24/545 >>> > > Addressed below review comments given by Rob >>> > > - Change the compatible property as per '<vendor>,<soc>-<block>' >>> > > format. >>> > > - Add header definitions for resets and power-domain cells. >>> > >>> > You didn't add any reset definitions though? >>> >>> We haven't added the reset definitions for videocc as there is no >>> video reset client. >> >> >> So? You don't know what resets there are? >> > > We know the resets, but video driver doesn't do any block resets > prior to accessing the video subsystem so that's the reason we do > not want to expose the resets in videocc driver. Bindings don't have to match what drivers currently use but should be complete as possible. Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
