On 2018-02-28 04:28, Andy Gross wrote:
On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 01:28:11PM +0530, Abhishek Sahu wrote:
<snip>
@@ -841,20 +856,12 @@ static int qup_i2c_bam_do_xfer(struct
qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg,
goto desc_err;
}
- if (rx_buf)
- writel(QUP_BAM_INPUT_EOT,
- qup->base + QUP_OUT_FIFO_BASE);
-
- writel(QUP_BAM_FLUSH_STOP, qup->base + QUP_OUT_FIFO_BASE);
-
qup_i2c_flush(qup);
/* wait for remaining interrupts to occur */
if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&qup->xfer, HZ))
dev_err(qup->dev, "flush timed out\n");
- qup_i2c_rel_dma(qup);
-
So this really only works due to the previous patch that adds the
flush/eot tags
to all of the read messages. If the answer to the previous question is
that
only the last read message gets the eot/flush, then this code needs to
remain in
place. Otherwise, it's fine.
Andy
Thanks Andy,
We need to schedule EOT/FLUSH after last message.
For following transfer
READ, READ, WRITE (FLUSH + EOT tags after that)
In this case, FLUSH will clear all the descriptors till WRITE and
trigger TX
completion. EOT will be copied in RX FIFO and trigger RX completion.
Thanks,
Abhishek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html