On 1/16/2018 12:02 PM, srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx>
When BAM is remotely controlled it does not sound correct to control
its clk on Linux side. Make it optional, so that its not madatory
for remote controlled BAM instances.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c | 15 ++++++++-------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c b/drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c
index 03c4eb3fd314..78e488e8f96d 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c
@@ -1180,13 +1180,14 @@ static int bam_dma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
"qcom,controlled-remotely");
bdev->bamclk = devm_clk_get(bdev->dev, "bam_clk");
- if (IS_ERR(bdev->bamclk))
- return PTR_ERR(bdev->bamclk);
-
- ret = clk_prepare_enable(bdev->bamclk);
- if (ret) {
- dev_err(bdev->dev, "failed to prepare/enable clock\n");
- return ret;
+ if (IS_ERR(bdev->bamclk)) {
+ bdev->bamclk = NULL;
+ } else {
+ ret = clk_prepare_enable(bdev->bamclk);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(bdev->dev, "failed to prepare/enable clock\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
I believe you can also keep pm_runtime disabled if BAM is remotely
controlled.
Thanks
Sagar
}
ret = bam_init(bdev);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
