Em Mon, 1 Jan 2018 19:42:40 +0000 Bryan O'Donoghue <pure.logic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > Right now it is not possible to return a value larger than LONG_MAX on 32 > bit systems. You can pass a rate of ULONG_MAX but can't return anything > past LONG_MAX due to the fact both the rounded_rate and negative error > codes are represented in the return value of round_rate(). > > Most implementations either return zero on error or don't return error > codes at all. A minority of implementations do return a negative number - > typically -EINVAL or -ENODEV. > > At the higher level then callers of round_rate() typically and rightly > check for a value of <= 0. > > It is possible then to convert round_rate() to an unsigned long return > value and change error code indication for the minority from -ERRORCODE to > a simple 0. > > This patch is the first step in making it possible to scale round_rate past > LONG_MAX, later patches will change the previously mentioned minority of > round_rate() implementations to return zero only on error if those > implementations currently return a negative error number. Implementations > that do not return an error code of < 0 will be left as-is. > > drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.c | 4 ++-- Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, Mauro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
