Hi Varada, On 6/14/2017 11:22 AM, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote: > Wait to signal done until we get all of the interrupts we are expecting > to get for a transaction. If we don't wait for the input done flag, we > can be inbetween transactions when the done flag comes in and this can > mess up the next transaction. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Gross <andy.gross@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <varada@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/spi/spi-qup.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-qup.c b/drivers/spi/spi-qup.c > index 2124815..7c22ee4 100644 > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-qup.c > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-qup.c > @@ -465,7 +465,8 @@ static irqreturn_t spi_qup_qup_irq(int irq, void *dev_id) > controller->xfer = xfer; > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&controller->lock, flags); > > - if (controller->rx_bytes == xfer->len || error) > + if ((controller->rx_bytes == xfer->len && > + (opflags & QUP_OP_MAX_INPUT_DONE_FLAG)) || error) Not sure why we need this additional check, because having read all the bytes implies transfer complete (or) why not just check only for QUP_OP_MAX_INPUT_DONE_FLAG ? Regards, Sricharan -- "QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
