On Thu, 2017-05-04 at 13:13 +0000, Kalle Valo wrote: > > > > This code intentionally checked if TX status was requested, and > > > if not then it doesn't go to the effort of building it. > > > > > > > What I'm finding puzzling is the fact that the only caller of > > ieee80211_led_tx() is ieee80211_tx_status() and it seems like > > drivers, such as ath10k, call this for each packet handled - but > > I'm likely missing something. Yes, many drivers do call it for each packet, and as such, this deficiency was never noted. > > > As it is with your patch, it'll go and report the TX status > > > without any > > > TX status information - which is handled in > > > wcn36xx_dxe_tx_ack_ind() > > > for those frames needing it. > > > > > > > Right, it doesn't sound desired. However, during normal operation > > I'm not seeing IEEE80211_TX_CTL_REQ_TX_STATUS being set and as such > > ieee80211_led_tx() is never called. > > So what's the conclusion? How do we get leds working? Well, frankly, I never thought the TX LED was a super good idea - but it had been supported by the original code IIRC, so never removed. Some people like frantic blinking I guess ;-) But I think the problem also applies to the throughput trigger thing, so perhaps we need to stick some LED feedback calls into other places, like _noskb() or provide an extra way to do it? johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
