On Mon 03 Apr 19:38 PDT 2017, Jonathan Neusch?fer wrote: > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 11:18:29PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote: [..] > > However, for us to reach this point in smsm_probe() the above > > qcom_smem_get() must have returned successfully, i.e. we have SMEM in > > place so there's no need to handle this case specifically. > > I came to the same conclusion but wasn't sure. I'll drop this part from > my patch. > > I'll send a v2 of this series, although after applying your suggestions, > I can't claim much originality anymore. > Don't worry about it. Looking forward to version 2. Regards, Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
