On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 10:42:34PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 04:16:58AM -0700, Jeremy McNicoll wrote:
> > +static const struct qcom_cc_desc gcc_msm8994_desc = {
> > + .config = &gcc_msm8994_regmap_config,
> > + .clks = gcc_msm8994_clocks,
> > + .num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(gcc_msm8994_clocks),
> > + .resets = NULL,
> > + .num_resets = 0,
> > + .gdscs = NULL,
> > + .num_gdscs = 0,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct of_device_id gcc_msm8994_match_table[] = {
> > + { .compatible = "qcom,gcc-8994" },
> > + { .compatible = "qcom,gcc-8994v2" },
> > + {}
> > +}
> > +
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, gcc_msm8994_match_table);
> > +
> > +static int gcc_msm8994_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > + struct clk *clk;
> > + const char *compat = NULL;
> > + int compatlen = 0;
> > + bool is_v2 = false;
> > +
> > + clk = devm_clk_register(dev, &xo.hw);
> > + if (IS_ERR(clk))
> > + return PTR_ERR(clk);
> > +
> > + compat = of_get_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "compatible", &compatlen);
> > + if (!compat || (compatlen <= 0))
> > + return -EINVAL;
>
> It is almost never correct to use of_get_property(). Please avoid it.
>
Hi Bastian,
Mark is basically suggesting that instead of using of_get_property() you
should be using something like of_device_compatible_match, or
of_device_is_compatible. This should simplify the code a little bit
too.
Unless I am misunderstanding Mark's comment.
-jeremy
> > +
> > + is_v2 = !strcmp(compat, "qcom,gcc-8994v2");
> > + if (is_v2)
> > + msm_gcc_8994v2_fixup();
>
> Either put some data in the of_device_id tables, and use that to determine what
> to do here, or use of_device_is_compatible() or of_match_node() to check the
> string.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
