Re: [RFC V2 PATCH 10/12] arm64: dts: msm8994 issolate non standard bootloader/LK entries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/21, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Wed 19 Oct 20:17 PDT 2016, Andy Gross wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 08:07:25PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> [..]
> > > Makes sense to me for things like Nexus phones here. What about DB410
> > > for example? Is there hope for a fix there? My bootloader is only a
> > > couple of months old and needs the properties still.
> > 
> > There won't be a fix for the 410c.  We barely got them to respin to use PSCI.
> > Stephen can correct me if I am wrong on this.
> > 
> > If this is fixed, it would be 8996+.  If..........
> > 
> > So this means introducing the msm-id's for the boards that currently require it,
> > and for the boards that will require it in the future.  And this would stay in
> > effect until the bootloader is able to parse the compatible strings or figure
> > this out without the msm-ids.
> > 
> 
> But if the bootloader at any point in the future would support picking a
> dtb by compatible strings instead of {msm,board,pmic}-id we wouldn't we
> just be back to the ridiculous compatible strings that tipped over into
> acceptance to these ids in the first place.
> 
> Or do we expect the boot loader to do a deep scan of the dtb to match on
> multiple nodes from the tree?

I'm pushing the bootloader team to do the deep scan of the dtb to
match up board compatible and pmic compatible strings so that we
don't have to keep these numbers around. Basically put what
dtbtool is doing into the bootloader so we don't have to post
process the dtb anymore. We're currently discussing how to
implement it and how to move the internal codebase to the new
scheme.

At least for 96boards I think we can update the lk bootloaders on
there to adopt this code. For other platforms like nexus though I
don't see a way we can update those bootloaders, and those
bootloaders require these properties exist in the dtbs, so we
should just throw the numbers into the dts files there and be
done with post processing. For bootloaders that require the QCDT
header, we'll have to keep running dtbtool there to generate the
header. Having the ids in the dts file or not doesn't really
matter there.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux