On Sunday, July 17, 2016 8:44:01 PM CEST Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 8:34 PM, Bhushan Shah <bshah@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 09:21:48PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> On Sunday, July 17, 2016 4:22:07 PM CEST Bhushan Shah wrote:
> >> > +
> >> > + smd {
> >> > + rpm {
> >> > + rpm_requests {
> >> > + pm8841-regulators {
> >> > + s1 {
> >> > + regulator-min-microvolt = <675000>;
> >> > + regulator-max-microvolt = <1050000>;
> >> > + };
> >>
> >> Maybe add a label at either the rpm_requests or the pm8841-regulators
> >> node so you can add properties in the leaf nodes withoutout having to
> >> specify the whole path?
> >
> > Sure, I will adjust patch.
>
> Please don't. After running into several cases where this would end us
> up in having a multitude of nodes each describing just a snippet of
> each level we decided not to do so in the general case for the
> Qualcomm boards.
>
> There are a few where we apparently ended up doing so anyways, but for
> all other cases of regulators we express the full tree in the dts, so
> please follow that so we don't mix the styles too much.
Ok, then how about this instead:
/smd/rpm/rpm_requests/pm8841-regulators {
s1 {
regulator-min-microvolt = <675000>;
regulator-max-microvolt = <1050000>;
};
...
};
That avoids the ridiculous intendation level but uses no labels.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
