Re: [PATCH v5 06/14] ARC: hardware floating point support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 17 Apr 2020, Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote:

> >  My suggestion would be to define the 
> > macro (using do { ... } while (0)) to copy the argument to a temporary 
> > variable, and do the bit-set operation in C code on that temporary 
> > variable rather than as part of the asm.
> 
> I can certainly do that if you think so.

As a general principle, if an operation is something that can readily be 
expressed in ordinary C code (and setting a bit certainly is), it's best 
to express it in ordinary C code, and make the inline asm something as 
short as possible only doing what ordinary C code cannot, so giving the 
compiler freedom in how it generates the code (unless the compiler e.g. 
generates bad code for something performance-critical, but that shouldn't 
be an issue here).

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux