On 2/26/20 11:27 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > I haven't followed the ARC contribution process closely, sorry. Do you > plan to contribute the port with a GLIBC_2.32 ABI baseline, or do you > want to support older binaries for an earlier non-upstream port, > backdating the baseline? No we don't need to support old binaries: 2.32 will be baseline > This matters because in the GLIBC_2.32 case, old binaries will not work > anyway, so we may as well require that they are rebuilt without > DT_INIT/DT_FINI. In this case, the glibc master defaults should work. Understood ! > If you want to support old binaries (which use older symbol versions > such as GLIBC_2.17), it may make sense to keep DT_INIT/DT_FINI support > as well. To achieve this, you need to add an <elf-initifini.h> header > file with > > /* Enable DT_INIT/DT_FINI support. */ > #define ELF_INITFINI 1 > > and keep the crti.S and crtn.S files you already have. Per the review comments on ARC port last year [1], I was advised to remove the ARC specific crt*.S so those are anyhow gone. [1] https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2019-01/msg00654.html _______________________________________________ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
