Re: [PATCH 08/15] nios2: Use Linux kABI for syscall return

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 19/02/2020 18:40, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On 2/10/20 11:20 AM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>> It changes the nios INTERNAL_SYSCALL_RAW macro to return a negative
>> value instead of 'r2' register value on 'err' macro argument.
>>
>> The macro INTERNAL_SYSCALL_DECL is no longer required, and the
>> INTERNAL_SYSCALL_ERROR_P follows the other Linux kABIS.
>>
>> Checked with a build against nios2-linux-gnu.
>> ---
>>  sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/nios2/sysdep.h | 10 +++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/nios2/sysdep.h b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/nios2/sysdep.h
>> index b02730bd23..eab888df32 100644
>> --- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/nios2/sysdep.h
>> +++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/nios2/sysdep.h
>> @@ -157,13 +157,14 @@
>>       (int) result_var; })
>>  
>>  #undef INTERNAL_SYSCALL_DECL
>> -#define INTERNAL_SYSCALL_DECL(err) unsigned int err __attribute__((unused))
>> +#define INTERNAL_SYSCALL_DECL(err) do { } while (0)
>>  
>>  #undef INTERNAL_SYSCALL_ERROR_P
>> -#define INTERNAL_SYSCALL_ERROR_P(val, err) ((void) (val), (unsigned int) (err))
>> +#define INTERNAL_SYSCALL_ERROR_P(val, err) \
>> +  ((unsigned long) (val) >= (unsigned long) -4095)
>>  
>>  #undef INTERNAL_SYSCALL_ERRNO
>> -#define INTERNAL_SYSCALL_ERRNO(val, err)   ((void) (err), val)
>> +#define INTERNAL_SYSCALL_ERRNO(val, err)     (-(val))
>>  
>>  #undef INTERNAL_SYSCALL_RAW
>>  #define INTERNAL_SYSCALL_RAW(name, err, nr, args...)            \
>> @@ -180,8 +181,7 @@
>>                       : "+r" (_r2), "=r" (_err)                  \
>>                       : ASM_ARGS_##nr				\
>>                       : __SYSCALL_CLOBBERS);                     \
>> -       _sys_result = _r2;                                       \
>> -       err = _err;                                              \
>> +       _sys_result = _err != 0 ? -_r2 : -_r2;                   \
> 
> Is there a typo here ? both cases seem to be -ve

It is, thanks for catching it. I have pushed b790c8c2ed to fix and
double checked nios2 syscall handling (arch/nios2/kernel/entry.S:205)
to certify that the modification does follow nios2 kABI.

_______________________________________________
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux