On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 06:33:47AM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > Le 11/02/2020 à 03:25, Anshuman Khandual a écrit : > > > > > > On 02/10/2020 04:36 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > > > There are good reasons for the way ARM does stuff. The generic crap was > > > written without regard for the circumstances that ARM has, and thus is > > > entirely unsuitable for 32-bit ARM. > > > > Since we dont have an agreement here, lets just settle with disabling the > > test for now on platforms where the build fails. CONFIG_EXPERT is enabling > > this test for better adaptability and coverage, hence how about re framing > > the config like this ? This at the least conveys the fact that EXPERT only > > works when platform is neither IA64 or ARM. > > Agreed > > > > > config DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE > > bool "Debug arch page table for semantics compliance" > > depends on MMU > > depends on ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE || (EXPERT && !(IA64 || ARM)) > > I think it's maybe better to have a dedicated depends line: > > depends on !IA64 && !ARM > depends on ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE || EXPERT > > The day arm and/or ia64 is ready for building the test, we can remove that > depends. Never going to happen as its technically infeasible, sorry. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up _______________________________________________ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
