On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 09:08, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Krzysztof, > > On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 5:53 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The ioread8/16/32() and others have inconsistent interface among the > > architectures: some taking address as const, some not. > > > > It seems there is nothing really stopping all of them to take > > pointer to const. > > Shouldn't all of them take const volatile __iomem pointers? > It seems the "volatile" is missing from all but the implementations in > include/asm-generic/io.h. It's kind of separate issue although I could squash it to limit redundant changes. > > Patchset was really tested on all affected architectures. I just spot an error in my first message. I wanted to say: "Patchset was NOT really tested on all affected architectures." Obviously. > > Build testing is in progress - I hope auto-builders will point any issues. > > > > > > Todo > > ==== > > Convert also string versions (ioread16_rep() etc) if this aproach looks OK. > > > > > > Merging > > ======= > > The first 5 patches - iomap, alpha, sh, parisc and powerpc - should probably go > > via one tree, or even squashed into one. > > Yes, they should be squashed, cfr. Arnd's comment. > I also wouldn't bother doing the updates in patches 6-10. Indeed, thanks for comments. Best regards, Krzysztof _______________________________________________ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
