Re: [GIT PULL] drm/arc: Yet another set of minor fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 10:24:42AM +0000, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Friday, December 13, 2019 1:22 PM
> > To: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>; David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx>; arcml <linux-snps-
> > arc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Eugeniy Paltsev <paltsev@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] drm/arc: Yet another set of minor fixes
> > 
> [snip]
> > > Not sure if you noticed re-spin of my pull-request in the previous message.
> > > Do you want me to send it in a separate email?
> > 
> > Yeah I guess this got lost again.
> So should I re-send it in another email or you will pick it up
> from existing thread?
> If I'm going to re-send it do I need to re-base it on today's drm/drm-next?

I just tried to vacuum it in, but it chokes the scripts since it's
multiple pull requests in one mail with quotes. So please redo in a clean

Wrt baseline, here's the recommendation in order of my preference:
- Just stuff it into drm-misc-next
- Base your tree on a tag from Linux
- If you need a specific depedency, base your tree on drm-next with that
  patch included.
- If it's even more complicated, do a multi-way topic branch with lots of

Cheers, Daniel
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation

linux-snps-arc mailing list

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux